Cabbit
Apr 18, 03:37 PM
Its a nice shot but i don't really get a sense of scale, i don't get the feeling for how big the mountain is.
applemacdude
Sep 8, 12:18 PM
No one>?
Nuck81
Dec 29, 08:23 PM
To the uninformed consumer, which is the majority of big chain business, bundles represent the best value.
But there should be an option to buy system only...
But there should be an option to buy system only...
KnightWRX
Apr 23, 07:10 PM
Your answer helped. So now I know that <**> are only for system provided classes.
Actually, <include.h> is for headers that are found in the -I include paths specified in the CFLAGS var usually with make. You could add -I/path/to/your/headers to your GCC command line and then #include <yourheader.h> just like any other "system" include. #include "yourheader.h" includes headers either with an absolute or relative path to the current working directory of the compiler, which when using a make based system, happens to be your source directory.
Just some extra info there for you.
Actually, <include.h> is for headers that are found in the -I include paths specified in the CFLAGS var usually with make. You could add -I/path/to/your/headers to your GCC command line and then #include <yourheader.h> just like any other "system" include. #include "yourheader.h" includes headers either with an absolute or relative path to the current working directory of the compiler, which when using a make based system, happens to be your source directory.
Just some extra info there for you.
more...
roland.g
May 5, 10:43 AM
Like I said, I'm just waiting for the WWDC announcement before I take any further action. If Apple says a July release, I might wait. If they say September, I'll have to freeze myself like Cartman.
I should also mention that any decision I make will also depend on the price. If Lion is $129, I'll be persuaded to wait. If it is substantially less (say around $29-$49), I'll definitely buy the iMac sooner than later.
+1. I expect it will be released by end of June or early July. I'm not in a hurry as I have a family member buying my 2007 iMac. And I would prefer it pre-installed. Price is certainly a consideration. But as some have pointed out, with the Mac App Store, they may very well sell the DL version for less. I also hope Lion gets rid of the traditional optical and goes USB or DL only. That said I would love to see all restore disks be USB but I'm not sure that OS X can boot from a USB?
Why would that be the case? If you want to sell your computer and you installed lion yourself, why would a computer with lion installed by Apple be worth any more assuming both systems have the same hardware?
I don't think it affects resale, however I prefer that my restore disk be Lion. Let's say you want to do a wipe and reinstall for some reason. That would involve using your restore disk, then installing Lion. I suppose you could install Lion without your restore disk, but Lion won't include iLife on it, so you still need to go back and install those Apps from the original restore disk. Just more of a pain.
I should also mention that any decision I make will also depend on the price. If Lion is $129, I'll be persuaded to wait. If it is substantially less (say around $29-$49), I'll definitely buy the iMac sooner than later.
+1. I expect it will be released by end of June or early July. I'm not in a hurry as I have a family member buying my 2007 iMac. And I would prefer it pre-installed. Price is certainly a consideration. But as some have pointed out, with the Mac App Store, they may very well sell the DL version for less. I also hope Lion gets rid of the traditional optical and goes USB or DL only. That said I would love to see all restore disks be USB but I'm not sure that OS X can boot from a USB?
Why would that be the case? If you want to sell your computer and you installed lion yourself, why would a computer with lion installed by Apple be worth any more assuming both systems have the same hardware?
I don't think it affects resale, however I prefer that my restore disk be Lion. Let's say you want to do a wipe and reinstall for some reason. That would involve using your restore disk, then installing Lion. I suppose you could install Lion without your restore disk, but Lion won't include iLife on it, so you still need to go back and install those Apps from the original restore disk. Just more of a pain.
Doctor Q
Jun 19, 12:05 PM
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember calderone: The key we all want added to our keyboardshttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/590397.png
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember chaosbunny: Mousepointer making infinite loophttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/294106.gif
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember jayducharme: History of Mac designhttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/285482.gif
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember solarthecat: !0,000,000 Postshttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/576033.gif
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember TheSlush: 10 million ideas ... and countinghttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/447590.gif
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember tuckerja: Garageband Classichttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/626569.gif
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember chaosbunny: Mousepointer making infinite loophttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/294106.gif
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember jayducharme: History of Mac designhttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/285482.gif
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember solarthecat: !0,000,000 Postshttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/576033.gif
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember TheSlush: 10 million ideas ... and countinghttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/447590.gif
http://images.macrumors.com/im/contest_runnerup.pngMember tuckerja: Garageband Classichttp://images.macrumors.com/im/10mcontest/626569.gif
more...
macpro2000
Aug 1, 06:00 PM
It's still beats the pants off anything windows...we're just used to everything working so well it's easy to critique.
HexMonkey
Jan 4, 05:11 AM
I have no problem with people making changes, that wasn't the issue. The issue was the fact that it was changed without notice while I was still working on the page ( I and many others are still learning the interface) .
Understood. In the future, you can add the editing template to an article while you're editing it to warn others not to. Usage is as follows (this automatically adds your name and the current date & time):
{{Editing|~~~~}}
I understand that fully, but i don't agree with the PM comment. The issue with PM'ing people not being appropriate may be true for a huge Wiki, or one on a site that isn't associated with a forum that has a PM system. Macrumors is neither of those, and it only takes a second to see if the person that created an article is online by checking the forums.
In this particular case a PM might have been more appropriate, but my comment was on the use of the cleanup template in general. Basically I was saying that PMs can't replace the template, although they could be used in addition to them.
I agree with the comment about changes being accepted by general consensus, however I don't understand why we need to work with you individually do modifications. That last point seems to contradict the comment about their being no ownership.
I see your point here, I guess what I meant was that in cases of disagreement there should be a discussion about it so as to prevent edit wars (where two or more people continuously revert each other's changes, which is just a waste of time). If such a discussion was to occur, I wouldn't have any more say than any other person in the discussion, and of course if my opinion wasn't the popular one my changes would be reverted.
I appreciate the feedback, and like most of the changes made, however the way in which the changes occurred were borderline disrespectful in my opinion of little importance. :(
Again, I'll admit that I went about it the wrong way, and I apologize for that. No disrespect was intended. I think we've both learnt from this, and I'm sure we'll work well together in the future. :)
Understood. In the future, you can add the editing template to an article while you're editing it to warn others not to. Usage is as follows (this automatically adds your name and the current date & time):
{{Editing|~~~~}}
I understand that fully, but i don't agree with the PM comment. The issue with PM'ing people not being appropriate may be true for a huge Wiki, or one on a site that isn't associated with a forum that has a PM system. Macrumors is neither of those, and it only takes a second to see if the person that created an article is online by checking the forums.
In this particular case a PM might have been more appropriate, but my comment was on the use of the cleanup template in general. Basically I was saying that PMs can't replace the template, although they could be used in addition to them.
I agree with the comment about changes being accepted by general consensus, however I don't understand why we need to work with you individually do modifications. That last point seems to contradict the comment about their being no ownership.
I see your point here, I guess what I meant was that in cases of disagreement there should be a discussion about it so as to prevent edit wars (where two or more people continuously revert each other's changes, which is just a waste of time). If such a discussion was to occur, I wouldn't have any more say than any other person in the discussion, and of course if my opinion wasn't the popular one my changes would be reverted.
I appreciate the feedback, and like most of the changes made, however the way in which the changes occurred were borderline disrespectful in my opinion of little importance. :(
Again, I'll admit that I went about it the wrong way, and I apologize for that. No disrespect was intended. I think we've both learnt from this, and I'm sure we'll work well together in the future. :)
more...
Simgar988
May 25, 01:00 AM
This game is amazing. Well both of em have been. I didn't play as the default character and I can picture my specific one very well in my head. All I want is ME3
fru
Jun 20, 05:38 PM
Work and the World Cup will keep me pretty well occupied until Thursday. And this site of course.
more...
edesignuk
Sep 12, 12:06 PM
Translated Link (http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hardmac.com%2Fniouzcontenu.php%3Fdate%3D2002-09-12%233406&langpair=fr%7Cen&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&prev=%2Flanguage_tools)
Abstract
Oct 17, 03:09 AM
Wow, that was sweet!
But yes, make that Apple logo appear for an extra 1.5-2 seconds or so. :)
But yes, make that Apple logo appear for an extra 1.5-2 seconds or so. :)
more...
macfan881
Jun 17, 11:19 PM
TMNT Turtles in Time is a classic theh graphics are a nice touch
Darwin
Jan 8, 05:42 PM
To use the G5 as a file server simply requires turing on File Sharing option in System Prefs > Sharing.
Depending on the OS version you can setup file sharing for Mac and Windows. Since the G5 is headless as you said you can also activate the vnc screen sharing which will allow you view and access it over the network. Ideally using wired will provide the best throughput since you will be limited to G (54mbps) speeds.
If your main aim is to share iPhoto and iTunes libraries it might be easier to setup sharing from within the apps themselves, of course iPhoto as far as i'm aware doesn't have a counterpart for Windows which can use Bonjour. That iPhoto encloses the whole library within a packaged file making it more tricky for simple file sharing.
Depending on the OS version you can setup file sharing for Mac and Windows. Since the G5 is headless as you said you can also activate the vnc screen sharing which will allow you view and access it over the network. Ideally using wired will provide the best throughput since you will be limited to G (54mbps) speeds.
If your main aim is to share iPhoto and iTunes libraries it might be easier to setup sharing from within the apps themselves, of course iPhoto as far as i'm aware doesn't have a counterpart for Windows which can use Bonjour. That iPhoto encloses the whole library within a packaged file making it more tricky for simple file sharing.
more...
joeyboyyy91
Apr 23, 02:23 PM
So does anyone else think apples next bluetooth keyboard should have backlit keys? and possibly black coloured keys, like macbook pro's etc, instead of white.
Is this possible?
What are your opinions - lets discuss.
Is this possible?
What are your opinions - lets discuss.
bafonso
Apr 30, 03:08 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A306 Safari/6531.22.7)
TetherMe
AppSync
Can you share internet with itether using a ipad 3g on 4.3.2? I'd like to use my 3g on my computer in coffee shops...
TetherMe
AppSync
Can you share internet with itether using a ipad 3g on 4.3.2? I'd like to use my 3g on my computer in coffee shops...
more...
definitive
Feb 7, 09:53 AM
This is my main concern: If I run a stream from a cable modem or fios provider to the website, and there are let's say 200 people on, wouldn't that pretty much choke the internet connection that's being used for the camera? I was wondering if there's some way to have the stream go to my web host and then maybe have people use their bandwidth. Kind of like streaming to Justin.tv where they act as the middle man so that your bandwidth isn't used up when more than one person is watching the stream.
EJBasile
Sep 15, 08:47 PM
yea... hack into it so that when it gets dark and someone walks by it starts playing the video from the ring...
Sydde
Apr 14, 10:44 PM
This one has better sound effects:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vyBKWGsisY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vyBKWGsisY
kainjow
Jun 17, 11:22 PM
Glad it's free this year. Good to learn about some new stuff coming out that hasn't yet been made public :)
Goldinboy17
Feb 9, 02:00 PM
If you like your phone, your provider, post good things about your experiences. This provider battle is growing old fast.... :confused:
Couldn't agree more. I don't see why you have to hate another network, is their competitor paying you off or what? If you like yours awesome, if you hate another wtf cares?
Couldn't agree more. I don't see why you have to hate another network, is their competitor paying you off or what? If you like yours awesome, if you hate another wtf cares?
psyduckiee
Apr 9, 06:12 PM
I really like my OtterBox Defender, as I mentioned in my review above I almost did not switch over to the the Ivyskin Q3. It is thick, it will not work in any of my docking ports but for protection you can't beat it. OtterBox has a new case in the works that my be of interest here. It has not been released yet it is called the Reflex, see the link below. According to the description it has the protection of the Defender with a slim design and a snap off bottom for docking. It sounds very interesting. :)
iJohnHenry
Feb 18, 06:34 PM
I'm interested to see what he's planning to build in it's place.
His crypt, perhaps a pyramid, or something already designed by �Bucky� Fuller?
His crypt, perhaps a pyramid, or something already designed by �Bucky� Fuller?
arn
Nov 16, 02:30 PM
can you post a screenshot how this is being obtrusive?
This is how it looks for me
This is how it looks for me
No comments:
Post a Comment